作者: Sayak Paul
创建日期 2021/08/01
上次修改日期 2021/08/01
描述:通过函数匹配进行知识蒸馏,训练更好的学生模型。
知识蒸馏(Hinton 等人)是一种将大型模型压缩成小型模型的技术。这使我们能够获得高性能大型模型的优势,同时降低存储和内存成本,并实现更高的推理速度。
在知识蒸馏:一位优秀的教师是有耐心且始终如一的中,Beyer 等人研究了各种现有的知识蒸馏设置,并表明所有这些设置都导致次优性能。因此,在开发资源受限的生产系统时,从业人员通常会选择其他替代方案(量化、剪枝、权重聚类等)。
Beyer 等人研究了如何改进知识蒸馏过程中产生的学生模型,并始终匹配其教师模型的性能。在本例中,我们将使用Flowers102 数据集来研究他们介绍的方法。作为参考,使用这些方法,作者能够生成一个在 ImageNet-1k 数据集上达到 82.8% 准确率的 ResNet50 模型。
如果您需要复习知识蒸馏并希望学习如何在 Keras 中实现它,您可以参考此示例。您还可以参考此示例,它展示了应用于一致性训练的知识蒸馏扩展。
要遵循此示例,您需要 TensorFlow 2.5 或更高版本以及 TensorFlow Addons,可以使用以下命令安装
!pip install -q tensorflow-addons
from tensorflow import keras
import tensorflow_addons as tfa
import tensorflow as tf
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
import tensorflow_datasets as tfds
tfds.disable_progress_bar()
AUTO = tf.data.AUTOTUNE # Used to dynamically adjust parallelism.
BATCH_SIZE = 64
# Comes from Table 4 and "Training setup" section.
TEMPERATURE = 10 # Used to soften the logits before they go to softmax.
INIT_LR = 0.003 # Initial learning rate that will be decayed over the training period.
WEIGHT_DECAY = 0.001 # Used for regularization.
CLIP_THRESHOLD = 1.0 # Used for clipping the gradients by L2-norm.
# We will first resize the training images to a bigger size and then we will take
# random crops of a lower size.
BIGGER = 160
RESIZE = 128
train_ds, validation_ds, test_ds = tfds.load(
"oxford_flowers102", split=["train", "validation", "test"], as_supervised=True
)
print(f"Number of training examples: {train_ds.cardinality()}.")
print(
f"Number of validation examples: {validation_ds.cardinality()}."
)
print(f"Number of test examples: {test_ds.cardinality()}.")
Number of training examples: 1020.
Number of validation examples: 1020.
Number of test examples: 6149.
与任何蒸馏技术一样,首先训练一个性能良好的教师模型非常重要,该模型通常比后续的学生模型更大。作者将 BiT ResNet152x2 模型(教师)蒸馏成 BiT ResNet50 模型(学生)。
BiT 代表 Big Transfer,在Big Transfer (BiT):通用视觉表示学习中引入。ResNet 的 BiT 变体使用组归一化(Wu 等人)和权重标准化(Qiao 等人)代替批归一化(Ioffe 等人)。为了限制运行此示例所需的时间,我们将使用一个已经在 Flowers102 数据集上训练过的 BiT ResNet101x3。您可以参考此笔记本以了解有关训练过程的更多信息。该模型在 Flowers102 的测试集上达到了 98.18% 的准确率。
模型权重在 Kaggle 上作为数据集托管。要下载权重,请按照以下步骤操作
kaggle.json
的下载,该文件包含您的 API 凭据。现在运行以下命令
import os
os.environ["KAGGLE_USERNAME"] = "" # TODO: enter your Kaggle user name here
os.environ["KAGGLE_KEY"] = "" # TODO: enter your Kaggle key here
设置环境变量后,运行
$ kaggle datasets download -d spsayakpaul/bitresnet101x3flowers102
$ unzip -qq bitresnet101x3flowers102.zip
这应该会生成一个名为 T-r101x3-128
的文件夹,它本质上是一个教师SavedModel
。
import os
os.environ["KAGGLE_USERNAME"] = "" # TODO: enter your Kaggle user name here
os.environ["KAGGLE_KEY"] = "" # TODO: enter your Kaggle API key here
!kaggle datasets download -d spsayakpaul/bitresnet101x3flowers102
!unzip -qq bitresnet101x3flowers102.zip
# Since the teacher model is not going to be trained further we make
# it non-trainable.
teacher_model = keras.models.load_model(
"/home/jupyter/keras-io/examples/keras_recipes/T-r101x3-128"
)
teacher_model.trainable = False
teacher_model.summary()
Model: "my_bi_t_model_1"
_________________________________________________________________
Layer (type) Output Shape Param #
=================================================================
dense_1 (Dense) multiple 626790
_________________________________________________________________
keras_layer_1 (KerasLayer) multiple 381789888
=================================================================
Total params: 382,416,678
Trainable params: 0
Non-trainable params: 382,416,678
_________________________________________________________________
为了训练高质量的学生模型,作者建议对学生训练工作流程进行以下更改
alpha
参数来完成的。此处使用 MixUp 以帮助学生模型捕获教师模型底层的函数。MixUp 在数据流形上不同样本之间进行线性插值。因此,这里的基本原理是,如果学生接受训练以适应它,那么它应该能够更好地匹配教师模型。为了结合更多不变性,MixUp 与“Inception 风格”裁剪(Szegedy 等人)相结合。这就是“函数匹配”一词在原始论文中出现的方式。总之,在训练学生模型时需要保持一致和耐心。
def mixup(images, labels):
alpha = tf.random.uniform([], 0, 1)
mixedup_images = alpha * images + (1 - alpha) * tf.reverse(images, axis=[0])
# The labels do not matter here since they are NOT used during
# training.
return mixedup_images, labels
def preprocess_image(image, label, train=True):
image = tf.cast(image, tf.float32) / 255.0
if train:
image = tf.image.resize(image, (BIGGER, BIGGER))
image = tf.image.random_crop(image, (RESIZE, RESIZE, 3))
image = tf.image.random_flip_left_right(image)
else:
# Central fraction amount is from here:
# https://git.io/J8Kda.
image = tf.image.central_crop(image, central_fraction=0.875)
image = tf.image.resize(image, (RESIZE, RESIZE))
return image, label
def prepare_dataset(dataset, train=True, batch_size=BATCH_SIZE):
if train:
dataset = dataset.map(preprocess_image, num_parallel_calls=AUTO)
dataset = dataset.shuffle(BATCH_SIZE * 10)
else:
dataset = dataset.map(
lambda x, y: (preprocess_image(x, y, train)), num_parallel_calls=AUTO
)
dataset = dataset.batch(batch_size)
if train:
dataset = dataset.map(mixup, num_parallel_calls=AUTO)
dataset = dataset.prefetch(AUTO)
return dataset
请注意,为了简洁起见,我们对训练集使用了轻微的裁剪,但在实践中应应用“Inception 风格”预处理。您可以参考此脚本以获得更接近的实现。此外,训练学生时不使用真实标签。
train_ds = prepare_dataset(train_ds, True)
validation_ds = prepare_dataset(validation_ds, False)
test_ds = prepare_dataset(test_ds, False)
sample_images, _ = next(iter(train_ds))
plt.figure(figsize=(10, 10))
for n in range(25):
ax = plt.subplot(5, 5, n + 1)
plt.imshow(sample_images[n].numpy())
plt.axis("off")
plt.show()
出于本示例的目的,我们将使用标准的 ResNet50V2(He 等人)。
def get_resnetv2():
resnet_v2 = keras.applications.ResNet50V2(
weights=None,
input_shape=(RESIZE, RESIZE, 3),
classes=102,
classifier_activation="linear",
)
return resnet_v2
get_resnetv2().count_params()
23773798
与教师模型相比,该模型的参数减少了 3.58 亿个。
我们将重用此知识蒸馏示例中的一些代码。
class Distiller(tf.keras.Model):
def __init__(self, student, teacher):
super().__init__()
self.student = student
self.teacher = teacher
self.loss_tracker = keras.metrics.Mean(name="distillation_loss")
@property
def metrics(self):
metrics = super().metrics
metrics.append(self.loss_tracker)
return metrics
def compile(
self, optimizer, metrics, distillation_loss_fn, temperature=TEMPERATURE,
):
super().compile(optimizer=optimizer, metrics=metrics)
self.distillation_loss_fn = distillation_loss_fn
self.temperature = temperature
def train_step(self, data):
# Unpack data
x, _ = data
# Forward pass of teacher
teacher_predictions = self.teacher(x, training=False)
with tf.GradientTape() as tape:
# Forward pass of student
student_predictions = self.student(x, training=True)
# Compute loss
distillation_loss = self.distillation_loss_fn(
tf.nn.softmax(teacher_predictions / self.temperature, axis=1),
tf.nn.softmax(student_predictions / self.temperature, axis=1),
)
# Compute gradients
trainable_vars = self.student.trainable_variables
gradients = tape.gradient(distillation_loss, trainable_vars)
# Update weights
self.optimizer.apply_gradients(zip(gradients, trainable_vars))
# Report progress
self.loss_tracker.update_state(distillation_loss)
return {"distillation_loss": self.loss_tracker.result()}
def test_step(self, data):
# Unpack data
x, y = data
# Forward passes
teacher_predictions = self.teacher(x, training=False)
student_predictions = self.student(x, training=False)
# Calculate the loss
distillation_loss = self.distillation_loss_fn(
tf.nn.softmax(teacher_predictions / self.temperature, axis=1),
tf.nn.softmax(student_predictions / self.temperature, axis=1),
)
# Report progress
self.loss_tracker.update_state(distillation_loss)
self.compiled_metrics.update_state(y, student_predictions)
results = {m.name: m.result() for m in self.metrics}
return results
论文中使用了预热余弦学习率调度。此调度程序对于许多预训练方法(尤其是计算机视觉)也很典型。
# Some code is taken from:
# https://www.kaggle.com/ashusma/training-rfcx-tensorflow-tpu-effnet-b2.
class WarmUpCosine(keras.optimizers.schedules.LearningRateSchedule):
def __init__(
self, learning_rate_base, total_steps, warmup_learning_rate, warmup_steps
):
super().__init__()
self.learning_rate_base = learning_rate_base
self.total_steps = total_steps
self.warmup_learning_rate = warmup_learning_rate
self.warmup_steps = warmup_steps
self.pi = tf.constant(np.pi)
def __call__(self, step):
if self.total_steps < self.warmup_steps:
raise ValueError("Total_steps must be larger or equal to warmup_steps.")
cos_annealed_lr = tf.cos(
self.pi
* (tf.cast(step, tf.float32) - self.warmup_steps)
/ float(self.total_steps - self.warmup_steps)
)
learning_rate = 0.5 * self.learning_rate_base * (1 + cos_annealed_lr)
if self.warmup_steps > 0:
if self.learning_rate_base < self.warmup_learning_rate:
raise ValueError(
"Learning_rate_base must be larger or equal to "
"warmup_learning_rate."
)
slope = (
self.learning_rate_base - self.warmup_learning_rate
) / self.warmup_steps
warmup_rate = slope * tf.cast(step, tf.float32) + self.warmup_learning_rate
learning_rate = tf.where(
step < self.warmup_steps, warmup_rate, learning_rate
)
return tf.where(
step > self.total_steps, 0.0, learning_rate, name="learning_rate"
)
我们现在可以绘制使用此调度程序生成的学习率图。
ARTIFICIAL_EPOCHS = 1000
ARTIFICIAL_BATCH_SIZE = 512
DATASET_NUM_TRAIN_EXAMPLES = 1020
TOTAL_STEPS = int(
DATASET_NUM_TRAIN_EXAMPLES / ARTIFICIAL_BATCH_SIZE * ARTIFICIAL_EPOCHS
)
scheduled_lrs = WarmUpCosine(
learning_rate_base=INIT_LR,
total_steps=TOTAL_STEPS,
warmup_learning_rate=0.0,
warmup_steps=1500,
)
lrs = [scheduled_lrs(step) for step in range(TOTAL_STEPS)]
plt.plot(lrs)
plt.xlabel("Step", fontsize=14)
plt.ylabel("LR", fontsize=14)
plt.show()
原始论文使用至少 1000 个 epochs 和 512 的批大小来执行“函数匹配”。本示例的目的是展示实现此方法的工作流程,而不是演示在完全扩展时应用的结果。但是,这些方法将转移到论文中的原始设置。如果您有兴趣了解更多信息,请参考此存储库。
optimizer = tfa.optimizers.AdamW(
weight_decay=WEIGHT_DECAY, learning_rate=scheduled_lrs, clipnorm=CLIP_THRESHOLD
)
student_model = get_resnetv2()
distiller = Distiller(student=student_model, teacher=teacher_model)
distiller.compile(
optimizer,
metrics=[keras.metrics.SparseCategoricalAccuracy()],
distillation_loss_fn=keras.losses.KLDivergence(),
temperature=TEMPERATURE,
)
history = distiller.fit(
train_ds,
steps_per_epoch=int(np.ceil(DATASET_NUM_TRAIN_EXAMPLES / BATCH_SIZE)),
validation_data=validation_ds,
epochs=30, # This should be at least 1000.
)
student = distiller.student
student_model.compile(metrics=["accuracy"])
_, top1_accuracy = student.evaluate(test_ds)
print(f"Top-1 accuracy on the test set: {round(top1_accuracy * 100, 2)}%")
Epoch 1/30
16/16 [==============================] - 74s 3s/step - distillation_loss: 0.0070 - val_sparse_categorical_accuracy: 0.0039 - val_distillation_loss: 0.0061
Epoch 2/30
16/16 [==============================] - 37s 2s/step - distillation_loss: 0.0059 - val_sparse_categorical_accuracy: 0.0098 - val_distillation_loss: 0.0061
Epoch 3/30
16/16 [==============================] - 37s 2s/step - distillation_loss: 0.0049 - val_sparse_categorical_accuracy: 0.0098 - val_distillation_loss: 0.0060
Epoch 4/30
16/16 [==============================] - 37s 2s/step - distillation_loss: 0.0048 - val_sparse_categorical_accuracy: 0.0098 - val_distillation_loss: 0.0060
Epoch 5/30
16/16 [==============================] - 37s 2s/step - distillation_loss: 0.0043 - val_sparse_categorical_accuracy: 0.0098 - val_distillation_loss: 0.0060
Epoch 6/30
16/16 [==============================] - 37s 2s/step - distillation_loss: 0.0041 - val_sparse_categorical_accuracy: 0.0108 - val_distillation_loss: 0.0060
Epoch 7/30
16/16 [==============================] - 37s 2s/step - distillation_loss: 0.0038 - val_sparse_categorical_accuracy: 0.0098 - val_distillation_loss: 0.0061
Epoch 8/30
16/16 [==============================] - 37s 2s/step - distillation_loss: 0.0040 - val_sparse_categorical_accuracy: 0.0098 - val_distillation_loss: 0.0062
Epoch 9/30
16/16 [==============================] - 37s 2s/step - distillation_loss: 0.0039 - val_sparse_categorical_accuracy: 0.0098 - val_distillation_loss: 0.0063
Epoch 10/30
16/16 [==============================] - 37s 2s/step - distillation_loss: 0.0035 - val_sparse_categorical_accuracy: 0.0098 - val_distillation_loss: 0.0064
Epoch 11/30
16/16 [==============================] - 37s 2s/step - distillation_loss: 0.0041 - val_sparse_categorical_accuracy: 0.0098 - val_distillation_loss: 0.0064
Epoch 12/30
16/16 [==============================] - 37s 2s/step - distillation_loss: 0.0039 - val_sparse_categorical_accuracy: 0.0098 - val_distillation_loss: 0.0067
Epoch 13/30
16/16 [==============================] - 37s 2s/step - distillation_loss: 0.0039 - val_sparse_categorical_accuracy: 0.0098 - val_distillation_loss: 0.0067
Epoch 14/30
16/16 [==============================] - 37s 2s/step - distillation_loss: 0.0036 - val_sparse_categorical_accuracy: 0.0098 - val_distillation_loss: 0.0066
Epoch 15/30
16/16 [==============================] - 37s 2s/step - distillation_loss: 0.0037 - val_sparse_categorical_accuracy: 0.0098 - val_distillation_loss: 0.0065
Epoch 16/30
16/16 [==============================] - 37s 2s/step - distillation_loss: 0.0038 - val_sparse_categorical_accuracy: 0.0098 - val_distillation_loss: 0.0068
Epoch 17/30
16/16 [==============================] - 37s 2s/step - distillation_loss: 0.0039 - val_sparse_categorical_accuracy: 0.0098 - val_distillation_loss: 0.0066
Epoch 18/30
16/16 [==============================] - 37s 2s/step - distillation_loss: 0.0038 - val_sparse_categorical_accuracy: 0.0098 - val_distillation_loss: 0.0064
Epoch 19/30
16/16 [==============================] - 37s 2s/step - distillation_loss: 0.0035 - val_sparse_categorical_accuracy: 0.0098 - val_distillation_loss: 0.0071
Epoch 20/30
16/16 [==============================] - 37s 2s/step - distillation_loss: 0.0038 - val_sparse_categorical_accuracy: 0.0098 - val_distillation_loss: 0.0066
Epoch 21/30
16/16 [==============================] - 37s 2s/step - distillation_loss: 0.0038 - val_sparse_categorical_accuracy: 0.0098 - val_distillation_loss: 0.0068
Epoch 22/30
16/16 [==============================] - 37s 2s/step - distillation_loss: 0.0034 - val_sparse_categorical_accuracy: 0.0098 - val_distillation_loss: 0.0073
Epoch 23/30
16/16 [==============================] - 37s 2s/step - distillation_loss: 0.0035 - val_sparse_categorical_accuracy: 0.0098 - val_distillation_loss: 0.0078
Epoch 24/30
16/16 [==============================] - 37s 2s/step - distillation_loss: 0.0037 - val_sparse_categorical_accuracy: 0.0098 - val_distillation_loss: 0.0087
Epoch 25/30
16/16 [==============================] - 37s 2s/step - distillation_loss: 0.0031 - val_sparse_categorical_accuracy: 0.0108 - val_distillation_loss: 0.0078
Epoch 26/30
16/16 [==============================] - 37s 2s/step - distillation_loss: 0.0033 - val_sparse_categorical_accuracy: 0.0098 - val_distillation_loss: 0.0072
Epoch 27/30
16/16 [==============================] - 37s 2s/step - distillation_loss: 0.0036 - val_sparse_categorical_accuracy: 0.0098 - val_distillation_loss: 0.0071
Epoch 28/30
16/16 [==============================] - 37s 2s/step - distillation_loss: 0.0036 - val_sparse_categorical_accuracy: 0.0275 - val_distillation_loss: 0.0078
Epoch 29/30
16/16 [==============================] - 37s 2s/step - distillation_loss: 0.0032 - val_sparse_categorical_accuracy: 0.0196 - val_distillation_loss: 0.0068
Epoch 30/30
16/16 [==============================] - 37s 2s/step - distillation_loss: 0.0034 - val_sparse_categorical_accuracy: 0.0147 - val_distillation_loss: 0.0071
97/97 [==============================] - 7s 64ms/step - loss: 0.0000e+00 - accuracy: 0.0107
Top-1 accuracy on the test set: 1.07%
仅经过 30 个 epochs 的训练,结果远未达到预期。这就是耐心(即更长的训练时间表)的好处发挥作用的地方。让我们研究一下经过 1000 个 epochs 训练的模型可以做什么。
# Download the pre-trained weights.
!wget https://git.io/JBO3Y -O S-r50x1-128-1000.tar.gz
!tar xf S-r50x1-128-1000.tar.gz
pretrained_student = keras.models.load_model("S-r50x1-128-1000")
pretrained_student.summary()
Model: "resnet"
_________________________________________________________________
Layer (type) Output Shape Param #
=================================================================
root_block (Sequential) (None, 32, 32, 64) 9408
_________________________________________________________________
block1 (Sequential) (None, 32, 32, 256) 214912
_________________________________________________________________
block2 (Sequential) (None, 16, 16, 512) 1218048
_________________________________________________________________
block3 (Sequential) (None, 8, 8, 1024) 7095296
_________________________________________________________________
block4 (Sequential) (None, 4, 4, 2048) 14958592
_________________________________________________________________
group_norm (GroupNormalizati multiple 4096
_________________________________________________________________
re_lu_97 (ReLU) multiple 0
_________________________________________________________________
global_average_pooling2d_1 ( multiple 0
_________________________________________________________________
head/dense (Dense) multiple 208998
=================================================================
Total params: 23,709,350
Trainable params: 23,709,350
Non-trainable params: 0
_________________________________________________________________
此模型完全遵循作者在其学生模型中使用的模型。这就是模型摘要略有不同的原因。
_, top1_accuracy = pretrained_student.evaluate(test_ds)
print(f"Top-1 accuracy on the test set: {round(top1_accuracy * 100, 2)}%")
97/97 [==============================] - 14s 131ms/step - loss: 0.0000e+00 - accuracy: 0.8102
Top-1 accuracy on the test set: 81.02%
经过 100000 个 epochs 的训练,同一模型可实现 95.54% 的 top-1 准确率。
论文中提供了一些重要的消融研究,这些研究表明这些方法与现有技术的有效性相比。因此,如果您对这些方法持怀疑态度,请务必查阅论文。
使用基于 TPU 的硬件基础设施,我们可以更快地训练模型 1000 个 epochs。这甚至不需要对该代码库进行大量更改。建议您查看此存储库,因为它提供了这些方法的兼容 TPU 的训练工作流程,并且可以在Kaggle Kernel上运行,利用其免费的 TPU v3-8 硬件。